Carl and I were on stand and had been calling for approximately 15 minutes with no results.  Suddenly, I spotted a single coyote cresting the low hill across from us. From 350 yards out, it proceeded to run straight into our setup.

My Wildlife Technologies electronic caller was situated well below us on the hillside and we had good cover against some large boulders.  The wind was also in our favor.

Glancing to my left, I could see Carl’s rifle leveled out and he was leaning into the scope.  Good — he had seen it also.

While easing my rifle into position for a shot at the incoming coyote, Carl fired his rifle.  Hearing the shot, the coyote I was watching pivoted and ran sideways at full speed.  Carl fired at it a couple of times and missed as it ran away.  I fired once and also missed.

When the dust settled, I stood up and said, “It got away.  Why didn’t you wait for it to come closer and stop moving before firing?”  Carl got a funny look on his face and calmly replied, “Dad, this stand was a double!  There’s a coyote on the ground out there.  My first shot took it out.  Didn’t you see it?”

Oops!  I hadn’t even seen the other coyote.  Better get my eyes checked.

We walked out and searched the brush for a few minutes.  Sure enough, a coyote was down.

I laser ranged back to the rock pile where we were sitting to be certain of the distance — 252 yards.  Nice shot Carl!

Idaho Coyote, September 2011, Remington R-15 VTR Carbine with AR Gold trigger

Thanks for reading.

Regards and good calling,

Mike Healy

The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, is helping to mitigate the loss of habitat in this area by contributing $150,000.00 to help with restorative measures within the burn area. The RMEF does a lot of good, weather working to preserve land for Elk habitat, or fighting to keep Wolf predation of Elk to a minimum.

To read the full story of the RMEF’s effort to help out Arizona’s Elk affected by this devastating fire, Click Here. I am a proud member of the RMEF and glad to see that the members dues are put to good use to benefit Elk and their habitat. Supporting organizations like RMEF benefit all hunters and outdoor enthusiasts, including those of us that enjoy predator calling.

I encourage you to become a member of the RMEF or other like organizations that work to preserve our lands that we enjoy to hunt, fish and other outdoor activities.

As always, we appreciate our readers comments.

All the best,

Marc Reindell

marc@wildlifecallers.com

I have written other blog posts HERE , HERE, and HERE and posted scouting photos on our Wildlife Callers’ Facebook Page that talk about terrain considerations when scouting and calling for mountain lions.  This video captures nicely the “lay-up” concept that we talk about.  As you watch the video and the camera pans right you will see (at about 27 seconds) the lion has chosen a daytime hideout just below a saddle located on the ridge line above the rock/brush pile it pops out of. 

Without seeing the area in person and being able to walk the ridges around the brushed up rock pile the cat jumped out of, we can only make an educated guess that the lion is using the ridge/saddle as part of it’s travel route.  Based on past experience with travel paths and scouting for lay-up areas to call into, it stands to reason that ridge line is at least one of the travel routes in the area. 

It is also highly likely that this or another lion will use this lay-up again in the future.  Having a location like this jotted down in a calling journal will provide a spot to call into every single time you’re in the area.  Other than calling the area and getting a mountain lion to respond, there is no reliable way to know exactly when the cat will be back.  Based on the radio collar data that we’ve looked at and the trail camera evidence that we’ve collected, the day or night and actual time the lion will show back up can’t be accurately predicted.  However, paths that they use for travelling get used again and again. 

Catching the lion the next time it’s in this lay-up is a game of chance, but persistence pays.  If you have 20 locations like this identified with scat, tracks, other sign, and perhaps some trail camera photos and you consistently call into  them, eventually you’ll be in the right place at the right time and you’ll get your big cat to come in.  We’re certain it’s a whole lot more reliable than random calling into areas that simply “look like good cat country” but have no physical evidence to go with the good looks. 

Thanks again for reading.  Comments and questions are always welcome at the bottom of this page. 

Subscriptions to the blog are free – Sign up below. 

Good luck this season,

Mark Healy

mark@wildlifecallers.com

480-882-1210

“The Endangered Species Act does not allow the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to list only part of a ‘species’ as endangered, or to protect a listed distinct population segment only in part as the Final Rule here does” 

Grey Wolf - US Fish and Wildlife Service

The Idaho Fish and Game Deputy Director reacted quickly to the action by the Federal Government, stating  “We’re frustrated; we’re angry; we’re disappointed.”  “We’ve played by the rules, but his decision allows procedural technicalities to overcome sound science and common sense.”  Governor Butch Otter and his Democratic opponent, Keith Allred, both echoed that sentiment, saying the State of Idaho should have the right to manage it’s wolf population.  

With the current Obama administration seeking a much larger footprint for the federal government, that might be asking a lot. 

Read more here: Idaho Statesman Article  

There were quick calls for an appeal by Gov. Butch Otter who sees the originally assumed numbers of wolves needed for “population sustainability” being conveniently increaseed by radical environmental groups.  In our last blog post on Idaho wolf hunting we feared that continuous efforts with lawsuits could achieve this setback.  However, we at Wildlife Callers, remain confident that the need for Idaho, Montana, and other states, to manage wolves on locally based field science and declining populations of elk, deer, moose, and other prey mammals will eventually win out in the court system.  We’ll keep you informed of this court case as it proceeds.  

We are also keenly aware of the millions of private and taxpayer dollars being spent to keep the wolves from being de-listed and keep them completely untouchable.  But, how small must the ungulate herds get before special interest groups claiming to care about the environment actually allow hunters to balance the wolf population against the deer, elk, and moose populations? 

A Shiras Moose tag in Idaho is already a “once in a lifetime” tag–on par with hunting a Bighorn Sheep in Arizona (currently being eaten to extinction by cougars with the help of “environmentalists”).  The “environmentalists” keep telling us that the gray wolf is a national treasure–we contend the Shiras moose population in the US is too.  Why must one be completely decimated so the other’s population numbers can satisfy an unscientific good feeling about wolves grounded in raw emotion and anti-hunting sentiment? 

For a good article about large wolf populations in the US and Canada (wolves ignore borders), wolf control efforts in Canada, funding for the wolf introduction program, impact to the Yellowstone elk herd, and more click here:  Has The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Become A Rogue Agency? 

Anti-Hunting Ideology… 

What’s very interesting is that when reading an article that’s anti-hunting and pro-wolf, the concerned “environmentalist” almost always makes mention that hunters “only” want to lower the wolf populations so they can continue to hunt elk and deer.  As if that is somehow a bad thing.  The truth is, they are anti-hunters and do think it’s a bad thing.  Given the option, they’d much rather see gray wolves hunt elk and moose to near extinction than to ever see a trophy bull hanging on your wall.  If hunters are free to hunt and kill wolves then the wolves aren’t killing trophy game animals.  

Remember, to an anti-hunter a wolf killing a 6×6 bull elk is beautiful nature and a hunter killing that same bull is premeditated murder.  It’s all part and parcel of an illogical, but well coordinated anti-hunting campaign in our schools (kids are a huge target audience), in our courts, and more and more inside our state and federal game agencies.  

What’s even more interesting is the number of death threats we receive from anti-hunters who read our blog.  Some of them will post a visceral hate for hunting, “animal murder”, guns, and “rednecks” in the same flowing and profane sentence and then follow up with statement that they’d like to “find us in their crosshairs and shoot us in the f#$@#ng head!”  

Irony so thick you could cut it with a Buck knife!

The silver lining… 

Nothing has changed with Idaho’s Fish and Game rules allowing electronic callers, wolf sounds, and antelope, deer, elk, and moose distress and other vocalizations, for hunting wolves.  All we need now is a court ruling that favors the rights of Montana and Idaho to manage their own wildlife.  

When it’s finally time to go hunting we’ll let you know and help you with an Wildlife Technologies e-caller full of real wolf sounds just for the occasion.   Both the Mighty Atom 15 and Mighty Atom 21 game callers can be outfitted for your wolf hunt in the United States or Canada.

Thank you again for reading.  Subscriptions to this blog are free and comments or questions are welcomed below.

Keep up the good fight and good hunting!

Mark Healy

As of this Wildlife Callers blog post (May 2010) it is NOT legal to use an electronic call to call/attract any animals with an electronic call on the San Carlos Reservation. 

San Carlos Indian Wildlife & Recreation Regulation 002-M

 You can access the regualtion by CLICKING HERE and then choosing “Regulations” on the left margin.

Yes, some of the rules and regs on San Carlos have changed often and this one is no exception.  However, better to know the current rules and either use hand calls, or go somewhere else.  I’ve hunted on San Carlos for the past 24 years and I will be headed elsewhere until it changes back.  Dave Martens and I have spent thousands of dollars in permit fees on San Carlos and we’re not sure what they’re trying to accomplish with this rule.   Hopefully it will change soon, but until it does the hand calling crowd will have it all to themselves!!

San Carlos has also been a hot hunting spot for out of state hunters looking for lots of ground to hunt and reasonable daily rates for predator calling and small game hunting.  If you know an out of stater that likes predator calling and hunting on San Carlos, please pass this blog post along.  The San Carlos Game & Fish guys have always been great with us, but they absolutely will ticket violators and confiscate your caller.

Thank you again for your questions that give us these opportunities to do some research and blog about it.  As always, subscriptions to the blog are FREE. 

If you have any comments, please scroll down and add them below in the comments section. 

Thanks for reading,

Mark Healy

mark@wildlifecallers.com